Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill

[EMPLOYMENT] Special Alert: Goodwill and Clean Records Do Not Shield Employees from Dismissal

Yum Kan Choong (“employee”) v Resort Villa Golf Course Berhad (“Company”) (Award No.: 768 of 2024)

 

The employee, who held a managerial position in the Company, had been employed for seven years. During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, he falsified invoices related to the purchase of thermometers intended for use at the Company’s premises. While the employee admitted to falsifying the invoices, he contended that the Company’s decision to dismiss him was disproportionate. He argued that a less severe disciplinary action would have been more appropriate, citing the following reasons:

(a) The thermometers were purchased as an act of goodwill and were not within his scope of duties; and

(b) He had maintained a clean disciplinary record throughout his tenure.

 

The Industrial Court, finding in favour of the Company, held as follows:

(a) Fabricating invoices constitutes a clear act of misconduct that irreparably damages the trust and confidence essential to the employer-employee relationship. There is no room for plausible counterargument.

(b) No reasonable employer could be expected to trust an employee, particularly one in a managerial position, who compromises integrity and honesty for minimal financial gain. Retaining an employee who consciously resorts to dishonest means to address issues would be both unreasonable and illogical.

(c) Trust and confidence are critical to the employment relationship. An employee who engages in dishonest conduct, particularly in violation of the employer’s code of conduct, undermines these fundamental principles.

(d) The employee’s tenure with the Company demonstrates his familiarity with its policies and the importance of strict compliance. Moreover, his managerial role imposed a heightened obligation to exemplify honesty and integrity, which he failed to uphold.

(e) While the employee expressed remorse, his lack of genuine contrition was evident in his attempts to excuse his misconduct and his initial dishonesty when confronted. This further undermines the trust required for continued employment.

EXPAND ARTICLE

The decision of the Industrial Court reinforces its strict stance on workplace ethics and integrity. By upholding the dismissal of a long-serving manager for falsifying invoices, the Court underscores that breaches of trust warrant severe consequences. This case serves as a reminder to organisations and employees alike that ethical lapses undermine professional trust and highlights the need for strict adherence to ethical standards and company policies.

The Industrial Court Award can be read here.

The Company was represented by Partner Amardeep Singh Toor and Associate Ashreyna Kaur Bhatia.

 

If you have any queries, please contact Associate, Ashreyna Kaur Bhatia (akb@lh-ag.com), or her team Partner, Amardeep Singh Toor (ast@lh-ag.com).

Share this article

Partners

Learn more about our partners who specialize in this area

Amardeep Singh Toor

Partner

Amardeep Singh Toor

Partner